welcome to Galaxy Commodity

Friday, 14 March 2014

Can commodity prices influence elections?

India is in the mood of parliamentary elections, and in less than 90 days, a new government will be in place in New Delhi. The Indian industry hopes that a new, stable government could perhaps help the country emerge from the current economic recession. People, as usual, are confused by electoral surveys and political predictions. But everyone agrees in unison that the new government needs to propel the country to a phase of economic resurgence.
One interesting national survey went largely unnoticed recently. The study conducted by the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) on behalf of Bharat Krishak Samaj says that farmers and rural Indians—the bulk of India’s vote bank—are really upset over the rising prices of essential commodities they consume and the low prices of the agricultural commodities they produce.
So, the moot question is, can commodity prices influence general elections in India? It looks that even though politics in India is divided over caste, creed, religion and communal passions and social divisions, a large number of voters will cast their vote on the impact the commodity prices had on their lives in the last five years.
The study--Report on the State of Indian Farmer--interviewed about 11,000 farmers in 274 villages of 137 districts across 18 states.
Here are some salient points from the survey:
**A significant number of farmers in India are ready to quit farming thanks to low returns from their produce. Given a chance, many of them are willing to migrate to urban areas for better living conditions. 47 per cent of those surveyed farmers said their condition is so bad that they prefer some work other than farming.
**About 70 per cent of the farmers surveyed said their crops got destroyed at least once in the past three years. About 58 per cent of them blamed both governments at the Centre and State for their problems.
** The survey, which also interviewed 4,298 women, found that 67 per cent of them felt that income from agriculture was not sufficient to fulfill the livelihood needs of their families. Of the 2,116 youth interviewed, only 20 per cent said they would continue farming.
**A large section of farmers – about 62 per cent – were not aware of the concept of minimum support price (MSP) for various crops that the governments keep declaring. This means the farmers are not really benefitting from government financial schemes to protect their agricultural produce from low prices.
**Most farmers said only rich farmers got the benefits of government schemes and policies, and only a tenth of poor and small farmers were found to have benefited from these schemes. Eighty-three per cent of the farmers had not heard about Foreign Direct Investment. Of them, 51 per cent said FDI should not be allowed since farmers may not be able to bargain.
**Most of those surveyed said price rise is going to be the most important poll issue in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. They also said that unemployment and issues related to irrigation would also dominate the elections.
**Over half of those surveyed – 57 per cent – felt that no political party cared about farmers’ interests. About 16 per cent felt that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) cared about farmers’ interest, while 13 per cent opted for Congress.
The survey on the eve of the parliamentary elections bares some truths. Majority of farmers have talked truth, because in the last few years farming has been an uneconomical activity thanks to volatile commodity prices and rising cost of production.
Prices of essential commodities like rice, dal, onion and vegetables have increased. But prices of several commodities that farmers produce have been caught in the vortex of volatility, low returns, bad weather and extreme environmental conditions.
70 per cent of Indians live in rural areas, but has any government at the State or the Centre cared to provide enough opportunities of financial inclusion, investment, technological know-how and irrigation facilities to the farming community in India?
If not, the state of commodity prices that has been affecting farmers and common man hard will considerably influence the electoral fortunes of several politicians and electoral candidates in the coming polls.

Friday, 7 March 2014

Russia Urged to Ease Crimea Crisis Under Sanctions Threat

The U.S. and European Union put Russian President Vladimir Putin on notice that they will be united on imposing sanctions if he’s unwilling to defuse the Ukraine crisis and pursue a negotiated solution.
As Crimean separatists backed by Russian forces pushed to split from Ukraine, the U.S. banned visas for Russian officials and others it said were complicit in violating the sovereignty of the ex-Soviet state of 45 million. U.S. President Barack Obama signed an order authorizing financial sanctions, while EU leaders halted trade and visa talks with Russia and threatened punitive economic measures in what’s become the worst rift between Russia and the West since the Cold War era.
Despite signs of divisions among EU leaders, Obama said today he’s confident that “we are moving forward together” to press Russia toward the “path of de-escalation.”
The U.S. and its allies will keep increasing pressure “to impose a cost on Russia and those responsible for the situation in Crimea,” he said at the White House. Implementation will be flexible “based on Russia’s actions,” he said.
Obama told Putin in an hour-long phone call today that Russia’s actions have violated Ukraine’s territorial integrity and brought on the penalties unveiled by the U.S. and EU, according to a White House statement. The standoff can be resolved diplomatically, through talks between Russia and Ukraine’s government, Obama told Putin, the White House said.
Putin and Obama hold differing views on the crisis, though U.S.-Russia relations shouldn’t be sacrificed, the Kremlin said in an e-mailed statement on the leaders’ conversation.

‘Political Will’

“This is a matter of political will, but there’s also a matter of diplomatic strategy,” said Juan Zarate, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington policy group, and author of “Treasury’s War: The Unleashing of a New Era of Financial Warfare.” The U.S. doesn’t want to be “too out in front in a way that not only presents a division in the West, but also that ultimately hurts European interests.”
Tensions in Ukraine have “increased risks” to Russia’s economy, already suffering from currency depreciation and capital flight, Fitch Ratings Ltd. said. The crisis threatens to derail $8 billion of international loans sought by at least 10 Russian companies, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
At a summit in Brussels, eastern EU states urging a tough line on the Kremlin clashed with some western counterparts that wanted to offer Putin more time to pull back. The mood shifted after a speech by Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk told reporters in Brussels.

Freezing Assets

The EU leaders agreed to make preparations for sanctions, as well as accelerate the timetable to draw Ukraine closer to the 28-nation bloc, EU President Herman Van Rompuy said. If Russia doesn’t doesn’t back down, European nations “will decide on additional measures, such as travel bans, asset freezes and the cancellation of the EU-Russia summit,” he told reporters.
Obama, in the executive order, authorized Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew to take steps that could include freezing assets or blocking American companies or individuals from doing business with Russians, Ukrainians or others deemed a threat to Ukraine’s security.
The Treasury Department is redoubling efforts to prevent illegally acquired Ukrainian assets from leaving the country, concerned that such transfers might destabilize the global financial system, said a department official who spoke by phone today under the condition of not being further identified.

Holding Fire

The U.S. wants to prevent misappropriated state assets, or proceeds of bribery or corruption, from entering the financial system. The Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network released a list of 18 people, including former President Viktor Yanukovych, subject to a Feb. 26 advisory for banks to monitor suspicious asset transfers. It hasn’t yet compiled a list of people and entities that might be targeted by the sanctions announced today, the official said.
The U.S. has held back on implementing such sanctions to give Putin time to consider a western proposal, Secretary of State John Kerry said. His remarks reflect uncertainty about how Putin will respond to such threats.
“Even as we will keep faith with what we have said we would do, we want to be able to have the dialogue that leads to the de-escalation,” Kerry said in Rome, where he met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov at an international meeting on Libya.

Economic Leverage

Anders Aslund, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, said the Europeans have greater economic leverage than the U.S. does -- and greater financial stakes given their own trade ties to Russia.
“Economic pressure essentially depends on Europeans taking strong actions, because Europe receives nearly half of Russia’s exports, while the United States only takes 3 percent of Russia’s exports,” he said in an e-mail.
The crisis already is having an economic impact. The ruble slid 0.9 percent against the central bank’s dollar-euro basket by 9:52 p.m. in Moscow. Russia’s Micex Index dropped 1 percent, extending this week’s decline to 7.4 percent. About $55 billion was erased from the value of the nation’s equities March 3 after Russian lawmakers approved troop deployments to Ukraine.
“So far, we’ve seen a major impact on the Russian economy and on the Ukrainian economy,” and some financial impact on bordering countries, European Central Bank President Mario Draghi told reporters in Frankfurt today. “It’s very, very difficult to foresee what is going to be the impact over a horizon of two, three years” if the crisis were to continue.

Energy Market

“For example, the impact on the energy market, what could this be on Europe?” Draghi said. “If we look at the next six months, the answer is going to be very mild. If we look at a year-and-a-half, it could be very serious.”
Europe depends on Russia for almost a third of its natural gas needs, including gas sent via pipelines through Ukraine.
With Ukraine’s problems magnified by the threat of default, the U.S. and Europeans also are taking steps to aid the new government.
The U.S. House of Representatives voted 385-23 for a bill to allow $1 billion in loan guarantees for Ukraine sought by the Obama administration. Further aid is being developed by Representative Ed Royce, a California Republican who leads the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and his Senate counterparts, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat, and Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican.

Aid Package

Arizona Republican John McCain, one of four senators working on measures to help Ukraine, said in an interview the package will include a loan-guarantee authorization, direct aid and language authorizing sanctions against Russia, including banking and travel restrictions.
The European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, yesterday outlined a wide-ranging Ukraine aid package worth 11 billion euros (about $15 billion) in loans and grants over the next couple of years, tied to the Kiev government striking a deal with the International Monetary Fund.
Western powers moved to deploy their economic weapons against Russia, as Ukraine’s new leader said on a visit to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s headquarters that “no military option is on the table.”
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen called the Crimea crisis “the gravest threat to European security since the end of the Cold War,” while offering political support to Ukraine, which is not a member of the Western military alliance. Asked if Ukraine wants to join NATO, a move that would further rile Russia, Yatsenyuk said, “It’s not on our radars.”

Unmarked Uniforms

Controlled by pro-Kremlin local leaders, Crimea, part of Russia until 1954 and home to its Black Sea Fleet, has been rocked by threats from Moscow to “protect rights and freedoms” of the region’s Russian-speaking community since Moscow-backed Yanukovych was ousted from Ukraine’s presidency last month. Russian-speaking troops wearing unmarked uniforms have surrounded Ukrainian bases in Crimea, demanding that their forces surrender.
Kerry told reporters in Rome that he had discussed a path for lowering tensions, which Lavrov said he would convey to Putin. The top U.S. diplomat called for talks between Russia and the Ukrainian government with international participation, and sending monitors into Ukraine, including Crimea. Kerry said under that path, Russia could “maintain its basing rights in Crimea, provided that it abides by its agreements and respects Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

Rejoining Russia

In contrast, lawmakers in Crimea voted in a non-binding measure to become part of Russia if voters agree in a referendum March 16. They also asked Putin and the parliament in Moscow to begin crafting procedures to make the province part of the Russian Federation, the state-run Crimean Information Agency reported.
Western leaders, including Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron, said today that such a referendum would be unconstitutional and illegal.
Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, who was jailed under Yanukovych, rejected a referendum as illegal and said Russian withdrawal is the “point of departure” for any negotiations.

Wednesday, 5 March 2014

High and persistent inflation makes Indians buy more Gold

 High and persistent inflation is one of the reasons for shifting preference towards investing in gold.
"Gold imports are highly correlated with households' inflation expectations. Indeed, in recent times high and persistent inflation has been one of the reasons for households preferring to put their saving in non-financial assets including gold, given relatively low real interest rates on deposits and financial instruments such as small savings and volatile capital markets."

There has been conflicting data releases on gold import quantities and value and so far nobody has a clue to the extent of the metal being smuggled into the country through airports, sea and land. Although official data shows India's gold appetite has fallen, actual imports could be higher than reported, Macquarie said.
"The data released by Ministry of Commerce, gold imports slowed to US$39bn in 2013 from US$53bn registered in 2012. Specifically, on a monthly basis, gold imports to India have shrunk to an average of US$1.3bn since June 2013, registering a decline of 74% over US$5.1bn (average) recorded in the previous 12 months. Government measures including increases in customs duty, measures to disincentivise gold imports and rupee depreciation all helped moderate Indians’ demand for gold. While there is no doubt that gold demand in India has slowed over the past few months, such a significant moderation seen over the past 6 months based on official data looks unlikely, in our view – we suspect actual imports would be somewhat higher than official data suggesst." 
According to the latest data released by WGC, Indians’ demand for gold (including jewellery and net retail investment) in volume terms stood at 975 tonnes in 2013, up 13% YoY. While gold demand in 1H of 2013 was up 59% YoY as Indians took advantage of
lower gold prices globally, the demand in the 2H of 2013 declined 24%YoY. Even in US$ terms, the slowdown in gold demand in India in 2013 was quite modest. As WGC mentioned in its report, the Indian gold market is fed by a number of alternative sources, including recycled gold, domestic production and unofficial imports. According to WGC,recycled gold helped to fill the gap left by the sharp drop in official imports.

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

Ukraine crisis: Most impact likely in Crude Oil, natural gas markets

Commodities play an important part in Ukrainian economy and hence the present crisis has created a new event risk for commodity markets, according to a special report by Deutsche Bank.
"The country’s commodity exports include agriculture, chemicals, metals and timber products. However, the country’s strategic position when it comes to natural gas flows is, in our view, the most relevant," Deutsche Bank said.
Europe is dependent on Russia for 30% of its gas supply, of which about 50% of these imports, or 15% of EU gas supply, arrive via Ukraine. The completion of the Nord Stream pipeline route under the Baltic Sea in 2012 reduced this
dependence from 80% (to 50%), but a complete halt would still be very disruptive. At the moment there are no signs of any reduction in flows.

Moreover, factors which will moderate the potential impact are the fact that gas storage levels across Europe are at unusually high levels owing to a mild European winter, and we are past the peak winter demand period.
Ukraine is also a major agricultural producer and consequently any disruptions to the country’s exports could have a meaningful impact on global balances. For example, it is not only forecast to be the world’s third largest exporter of corn in 2013-14 after the US and Brazil, but, Ukraine is also the world’s sixth largest exporter of wheat.
Ukraine crisis would have more impact on crude oil and natural gas as they constitute around 13% of commodity net imports as a share of GDP. The threat of an interruption of European gas suppllies imported from Russia via Ukraine has emerged for the first time since 2009, when gas shipments were halted as a result of disputes over import prices, transit fees and delayed payment.
This time around, the situation is different as a result of two factors: (i) the new pipeline route called Nord Stream, and (ii) the seasonally high level of gas inventories in Europe. While a complete halt of natural gas imports from Russia would still be an extremely disruptive event for the European gas network, the halt of Ukraine gas transit alone would have to last longer than in the past to be of equal importance.
Agriculture and metals
Ukraine's agriculture exports account for less than 5% of GDP while metal exports comprised less than 2% of net exports between 2010 and 2012. Hence impact on metals and agriculture sector would be weak,Deutsche Bank said.